The Florida Supreme Court docket has rejected a bid by a pair of pari-mutuels to strike down the Seminole Gaming Compact, which permits the Seminole Tribe to conduct sports activities betting.

West Flagler Associates, which owns Magic Metropolis On line casino in Miami and Bonita Springs Poker Room in Southwest Florida, has to date failed in its lawsuit in federal court docket to halt the compact, sealed in 2021 between the state and the Seminole Tribe of Florida.

A decrease court docket initially struck down the sports activities betting portion of the compact, which allowed the Tribe to supply betting on its on-line app, even when clients weren’t on Seminole lands, which federal regulation requires. An appellate court docket, although, overturned the ruling and the Tribe began to supply sports activities betting once more in Florida final fall. The U.S. Supreme Court docket remains to be contemplating whether or not to take up an enchantment.

When the sports activities betting got here again on-line, West Flagler Associates, which hadn’t beforehand sued in state court docket to dam the compact, appealed on to the Florida Supreme Court docket, asserting that Gov. Ron DeSantis overstepped his authority in signing the deal.

However in its ruling Thursday, the court docket discovered that “quo warranto,” the Latin phrase for the reasoning behind the petition filed by West Flagler Associates, “is just not, and has by no means been, the correct car to acquire a declaration as to the substantive constitutionality of an enacted regulation. For that motive, we deny the petition as a result of the reduction that Petitioners search is past what the writ of quo warranto offers.”

The 11-page opinion was written by Justice Meredith Sasso for a unanimous court docket. Sasso famous that though West Flagler Associates cited a case in 2009 when the Legislature challenged then-Gov. Charlie Crist’s transfer to signal a compact with out getting legislative approval, that doesn’t imply the same problem will be made on the present compact.

That case concerned a problem of a Governor’s authority, whereas West Flager Associates is not only difficult DeSantis’ authority, however asking the court docket to declare the compact in violation of the state structure. West Flagler Related the compact expanded playing, contradicting an modification handed by voters in 2018 requiring any growth of gaming to be authorized by voters sooner or later.

“That factual background distinguishes the case from Petitioners’ problem right here, as Petitioners problem the substance of the settlement reached by the Governor and ratified by the Legislature relatively than the naked capacity to behave,” Sasso wrote.

Publish Views: 0


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *