[ad_1]

A British Columbia Supreme Court docket choose has rejected an software to exclude the daddy of a murdered 13-year-old lady from listening in remotely to post-trial proceedings.

The lady was discovered lifeless in a Metro Vancouver park in 2017, and a jury discovered Ibrahim Ali responsible of her first-degree homicide final December.

Ali’s trial attorneys, Kevin McCullough and Ben Lynskey, have been refusing to attend post-trial hearings, citing security considerations over an allegation the lady’s father introduced a loaded gun to the Vancouver courtroom on the day of the decision.

Ali’s attorneys had argued the person’s presence, even just about, could be distracting and intimidating to the purpose it will compromise their potential to defend their shopper.

However the choose says the sufferer’s father hasn’t been charged within the alleged gun incident, though he was arrested and launched with orders to not go to the courthouse in particular person, to not contact Ali or his attorneys, and to not possess any firearms.

SEE PREVIOUS:

Bernard says these circumstances together with the transfer to a safe courtroom strike the correct stability between security and the daddy’s curiosity in following the proceedings.

Brock Martland, who represented the daddy, had informed the court docket that his shopper didn’t deliver a gun to court docket on Dec. 8, the day of the decision.

The daddy can’t be named due to a publication ban on the identification of his daughter, whose physique was present in a park in Burnaby, B.C.

Ali has but to be sentenced within the case. He faces a compulsory life time period with no likelihood of parole for 25 years.

This report by The Canadian Press was first revealed Feb. 9, 2024.

[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Difference Between Intel And AMD Difference Between Intel And AMD Processors What Is The Difference Between Intel And AMD Processors